A

PublicationsPublications

Publications

Abrams, S. (1989) The Complete Polygraph Handbook. Lexington Books: D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.

Ansley, N. (1990) The Validity and Reliability of Polygraph Decisions in Real Cases. Polygraph, 19(3) 169-181.

Crewson, P.E. (2000) A Comparative Analysis of Polygraph with other Screening and Diagnostic Tools. June 2001. Report No. DODPI01-R-0003.

Honts, C.R. (1994) TR-07-94. Field Validity Study of the Canadian Police College Polygraph Technique. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Police Research Centre.

Johnson, B. (2000) Polygraphy: A Window on the Truth and an End to False Allegations.

Kleiner, M., ed. (2001) Handbook of Polygraph Testing. London: Academic Press.

Krapohl, D.J. and Vélez, Y. (2003) A Polygraph Technique for Evidentiary Applications. Polygraph, 30(1).

Lévesque, G. (2003) November. Les experts dans les causes litigieuses: Usage et abus. Association du Barreau canadien.

Lykken, D.T. (1998) A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector. New York: Plenum Trade.

Matte, J.A. (1996) Forensic Psychophysiology Using the Polygraph: Scientific Truth Verification – Lie Detection. J.A.M. Publications, Williamsville, NY.

Matte, J.A. (2000) Examination and Cross-Examination of Experts in Forensic Psychophysiology Using the Polygraph. J.A.M. Publications, Williamsville, NY.

Olsen, D.E. and Harris, J.C. (2001) Validation of the PolyScore 5.1, Zone Comparison Scoring Algorithms. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD.

Raskin, D.C., Barland, G.H., and Podlesny, J.A. (1977) Validity and Reliability of Detection of Deception. Polygraph, 6(1), 1-39.

Reid, J.E. and Inbau, F.E. (1977) Truth and Deception: The Polygraph ("Lie Detector") Technique. 2nd edition. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore.

Reimnitz, S., C.R. (1999) Récents développements en matière de Polygraphie. La Chronique Juridique, A.C.E.I.

National Research Council of The National Academies. (2003) The Polygraph and Lie Detection. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

United States v. William Galbreth. Crime No. 94-197 MV. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. October 4, 1995. 908 F. Supp. 877, 64 USLW 2260, 43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 585.

Van Aperen, S. (1996) The Polygraph as an Investigative Tool in Criminal and Private Investigations.

Widacki, J. and Horvath, F. (1978) An Experimental Investigation of the Relative Validity and Utility of the Polygraph Technique and Three Other Common Methods of Criminal Identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 23: 596-601, No. 3, July.

Top of the page Top of the page


Recommended Reading

Charles R. Honts, Ph.D. — Polygraph Law Resource Page
http://truth.boisestate.edu/polygraph/polylaw

James Allan Matte, Ph.D. (1996) Forensic Psychophysiology Using the Polygraph: Scientific Truth Verification – Lie Detection. J.A.M. Publications, Williamsville, NY.

James Allan Matte, Ph.D. (2000) Examination and Cross-Examination of Experts in Forensic Psychophysiology Using the Polygraph. J.A.M. Publications, Williamsville, NY.

 

Top of the page Top of the page

MAIN MENU


Welcome

About John Galianos

Curriculum Vitae

The Company

Mission

Services

Brief History of the Polygraph

The Polygraph and How it Works

Polygraph Procedures

Legal Aspects of the Polygraph

FAQs

Links

Publications

Contact Us

Home
 


Copyright © 2006 Galianos Polygraphe Expert Inc. Tous droits réservés.